When I first found out about UX Design, I thought it was such an amazing thing, to be able to design the experience of something for people. And now, I think it’s incredible that this area of design just keeps improving and adapting every time! It is an area that we’ll never stop growing (hopefully), because making the connection between the product and the user, is what makes for a great experience.

Read more...

Four future-UX terms to know (fast refresher)

• HCI — Human–Computer Interaction  
  The roots of UX: aligning tech with real human thinking, feeling, behaving. Usability is table stakes; context is king.
• AUI — Adaptive User Interfaces
  Interfaces that reconfigure in real time. E.g., stress-aware UIs that simplify when users are under pressure; dashboards that grow with skill level.
• EDX — Ethical Design Experience
  Privacy-first defaults, explainable AI, inclusive access. Ethics is a product feature, not a footnote.
• EIX — Emotional Intelligence Experience
  Products that sense frustration, respond with kindness, and build trust. Tone, timing, and microcopy matter.

Why this matters (2025+)

•  AI is everywhere; trust becomes the differentiator.
• Adaptive flows reduce cognitive load and boost equity.
• Emotionally aware products keep humans in the loop—safely.

Spark the conversation (reply to 1–2 of these)

1. AUI in the wild: Where have you seen a product adapt to you in real time—helpful or creepy?
2. Ethics trade-offs: What privacy or transparency feature would you refuse to ship without in 2025?
3. Signals for empathy: What lightweight signals (text tone, timing, haptics, animation) have you used to defuse user frustration?
4. Measuring EIX: How would you measure emotional intelligence in a product—beyond CSAT/NPS?
5. Accessibility x AI: Where can adaptive UIs most meaningfully reduce barriers for neurodiverse users or low-bandwidth contexts?
6. Explainable by design: Share your favorite “Why am I seeing this?” pattern or model card that actually worked for non-experts.
7. Failure moments: When AI is wrong, what’s your go-to recovery pattern (undo, preview, sandbox, human-in-the-loop)?
8. Team workflow: How are your design/PM/eng teams dividing responsibilities for HCI, AUI, EDX, and EIX?
9. Guardrails: What’s one AI capability you’d de-scope until you can ship it ethically?
10. Career shift: What new skill (or artifact) are you adding to your UX toolkit this year—journey data maps, red-team prompts, model briefs?

Read more...

Claude Can Now Create and Edit Files
Claude can now generate and edit documents, spreadsheets, slides, and PDFs directly in the app, allowing users to turn prompts and data into downloadable files.
SOURCE:  www.anthropic.com/news/create-files
Microsoft to lessen reliance on OpenAI by buying AI from rival Anthropic  
Claude will be integrated into Office 365 apps, ending Microsoft's exclusive reliance on OpenAI. OpenAI has continued to put strain on its relationship with Microsoft by announcing competitive products, including an AI-powered LinkedIn rival and custom chips built by Broadcom.

Microsoft will pay to use Anthropic’s AI in Office 365 apps,  The Information  reports, citing two sources. The move means that Anthropic’s tech will help power new features in Word, Excel, Outlook, and PowerPoint alongside OpenAI’s, marking the end of Microsoft’s previous reliance solely on the ChatGPT maker for its productivity suite. 

Microsoft’s move to diversify its AI partnerships comes amid a growing rift with OpenAI, which has pursued its own infrastructure projects as well as a potential LinkedIn competitor.

SOURCE:  techcrunch.com/2025/09/09/microsoft-to-l...from-rival-anthropic


 

Read more...

Yes, this is the way... except if there might be a better TOPIC area than under Announcements "Current Events: 2025 and Beyond".
Depends on what the Topic would be for THIS Test Discussion Group.

Is this a public-facing discussion topic viewed by external non-members,
or is it a Members-only discussion topic (about a certain subject),
or is it something for internal members/admin or management team?

As an example of information flow, the recommended "test discussion group" might also be in the category PRIVATE > Internal Brainstorming Discussions OR Pilot Project(s): Discussions & Details

your thoughts?

Read More...

1. Explain Like I’m 5
2. Examples and Analogies
3. Motivation Boost
4. Role-Play a Scenario
5. Study Plan Generator
6. Quiz Me!
7. Mindmap It
8. Expert Roundtable
9. Mental Associations
10. Improve What You Have

Share an example of how you used it and what happened!

Source:  incubator.org/applications/blogs/prompt-...nd-lifelong-learners

Read More...

This discussion thread can be used along with other instructions and prompts, when following the "Moves" that are referenced in the Blog article Digital Literacy: A Master Hub for Everyone - A practical, inclusive guide to skills, tools, and habits for the digital world.

Read More...

When do you truly need Spark/Kafka vs. fast local tools like DuckDB?
All Personas
Deliverable: A one-paragraph “Do I need big data?” decision note + a tiny DuckDB demo.
Copy Prompt: Create a short note that compares Pandas vs DuckDB vs Spark for my use case, then give a DuckDB SQL snippet that runs a simple aggregation on a sample CSV.

Post here: Paste your decision note + DuckDB snippet + output screenshot

Read More...

Stand up Python + notebooks, basic Pandas/NumPy/Matplotlib, intro SQL, and Git. 
Teacher
Deliverable: A starter Colab notebook for students + rubric.
Copy Prompt: Build a beginner Colab that loads a CSV, cleans 2 columns, plots a chart, and asks 3 reflection questions. Add a 4-level rubric. 

Student
Deliverable: Your first notebook link + screenshot of a chart.
Copy Prompt: Walk me through setting up Colab + a Pandas demo with 3 basic operations (filter, groupby, plot) and 3 SQL practice queries. 

Student Entrepreneur
Deliverable: A tiny repo with a CLI script (read CSV → print summary).
Copy Prompt: Generate a minimal project structure with README and a Python CLI that summarizes a CSV (rows, columns, missing %, top categories). 

Working Adult / Entrepreneur
Deliverable: A “data pull” notebook for your job (reads one source and outputs a report).
Copy Prompt: Draft a notebook template that pulls data from [CSV/API], cleans it, and outputs a short weekly HTML report with 3 plots.  

Post here: GitHub/Colab link + what tripped you up.

Read More...

Step 2 — Programming Fundamentals
Stand up Python + notebooks, basic Pandas/NumPy/Matplotlib, intro SQL, and Git.

Teacher
Deliverable: A starter Colab notebook for students + rubric.

Student
Deliverable: Your first notebook link + screenshot of a chart. ​​​​​​​

Student Entrepreneur
Deliverable: A tiny repo with a CLI script (read CSV → print summary). ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Working Adult / Entrepreneur
Deliverable: A “data pull” notebook for your job (reads one source and outputs a report). ​​​​​​​

Post here: GitHub/Colab link + what tripped you up.

Read More...

This discussion series mirrors the article All-in-One Roadmap to Learn AI .
Work through Steps 1–9 and post your deliverables under each step.
Choose your persona track when you reply:

• Teacher
• Student
• Student Entrepreneur
• Working Adult / Entrepreneur

How to post: In your reply, start with your persona + step (e.g., “Teacher • Step 3”), paste your “Copy Prompt,” include screenshots/links (Colab, GitHub, Streamlit), and add 1 question for the group.
Jump in: Use the “Discuss, Compare, Improve” buttons at the bottom of the article or open any Step thread below.

Read More...

While many AI literacy conversations point outward to third-party tools and platforms, our greatest opportunity lies within Incubator.org’s own ecosystem—a secure, private, ad-free environment built for collaboration, reflection, and skill development.

The CCLAC pilot projects taking place in the real world—whether in arts, civic engagement, environmental stewardship, or workforce development—don’t exist in isolation. They can (and should) feed directly into our online community features, where the learning, dialogue, and outcomes are extended, documented, and amplified.

1. Blogs: Documenting & Reflecting on Field Activities
Participants and facilitators can use the Blogs application to publish reflections, case studies, and lessons learned from offline AI literacy activities—such as unplugged strategies and group discussions. This creates a living knowledge base authored by our members, where ideas from the field are shared, questioned, and refined.

2. Discussions: Turning Activities into Ongoing Dialogues
The Discussions area allows any pilot activity to continue beyond its in-person moment. For example:

• Post follow-up prompts from a “Bias Mapping Game” to invite additional examples and perspectives.
• Debate ethical questions raised in a “Human-AI Debate Simulation” so voices from across the network can weigh in.

This is where real-world work is turned into collective intelligence, accessible to all members.

3. Courses & Certificates: Formalizing Learning Pathways
Our Courses application makes it possible to take the most impactful unplugged activities and turn them into structured learning modules—complete with video, reading materials, discussion prompts, and quizzes. Participants can earn completion certificates, recognizing their engagement and understanding.

This approach builds a sustainable AI Literacy curriculum authored and owned by the community, not outside vendors.

4. Data Studio: Gathering & Analyzing Insights
Perhaps our most powerful tool for connecting offline activity with online impact is the Data Studio. After running a pilot project activity in the field, facilitators can:

• Create surveys to collect participant feedback (quantitative metrics + qualitative reflections).
• Use Data Studio’s analytics features to visualize trends, compare responses over time, and identify emerging needs.
• Share secure reports with project teams or funders—knowing the data is protected in our private, ad-free environment.

This not only strengthens program evaluation but also closes the loop between in-person engagement and digital learning.

A Safe, Private Space for Authentic Exchange
Unlike public platforms, Incubator.org offers a non-commercial, secure space where members can explore sensitive topics—like AI ethics and cultural implications—without the noise or manipulation of ad-driven algorithms. This makes it possible to build a community that is both critical and creative, working toward shared goals with trust and transparency.

Call to Action:
For every CCLAC pilot activity happening offline, let’s create an online counterpart—a blog post, discussion thread, course module, or Data Studio survey—so that our learning, debate, and data are captured, expanded, and woven into the larger story of our work.

Read More...